Data analysis methods suited to the NIPN set-up (3/3)

3. Analysis of the cost-effectiveness of interventions requires a research setting

  • Measuring the cost-effectiveness of interventions requires the comparison of different interventions, measuring their relative impact, and measuring very precisely all direct and indirect costs related to the interventions.
  • It typically requires a research setting and a rigorous scientific study design to collect these data.
  • A cost-effectiveness analysis is not suited to the NIPN approach, which does not aim to collect new data, but rather make use of existing data collected in population-based surveys.
*****
Example of a cost-effectiveness study
  • The REFANI Pakistan study – a cluster randomised controlled trial of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of cash-based transfer programmes on child nutrition status: study protocol. Fenn B. et al. 2015. BMC Public Health 15(1044).
  • The E-lena library of WHO compiled more than 100 peer reviewed articles and reports assessing the cost-effectiveness of a wide range of nutrition interventions in a variety of contexts and settings.
*****
We use cookies. By continuing to use our site, you agree to this. Details and objection options can be found in our privacy policy.
Use of third party offers

In addition to technically necessary ‘session’ cookies, this website uses Matomo tracking as well as video hosting from Youtube.com and Vimeo.com.

When you choose to play a video, your browser establishes a connection to third-party providers’ servers, which may automatically transmit your IP address as well as information about your browser, operating systems, date/time and the address of our website to them.

Tracking cookie from Matomo

Matomo is used in a GDPR-compliant manner, as it only collects and processes data within this website. It is used for non-personal tracking of user interaction.